Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Part 2: How TAD Amounts Are Determined — and Why Some Are Much Bigger Than Others
A plain-English guide for Columbus, Georgia residents
Part 1 introduced the basic idea of how a TAD generates money: property values go up, the new tax revenue above the original baseline is called the Tax Increment, and that increment flows into a special fund used to pay off redevelopment bonds. Part 2 goes deeper — explaining how that number is actually calculated, what guardrails prevent the system from being abused, and why some TADs generate dramatically more money than others.
There are two distinct things people usually mean when they ask this question: how much money flows into the TAD fund each year, and how much a developer is allowed to request from it.
The amount flowing into the TAD fund each year is determined by a simple formula set by Georgia’s Redevelopment Powers Law and verified annually by the State Department of Revenue:
Here’s what that looks like with real numbers:
| Stage | Property Value | Annual Tax Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Before the TAD (base year) | $1 million (vacant lot) | $40,000 → this is the Base |
| After development | $50 million (new mixed-use center) | $2,000,000 per year |
| The Increment (what goes into the TAD fund) | $2M − $40K | $1,960,000 per year |
The city and school system keep their original $40,000 — always. The other $1,960,000 goes into the TAD fund, earmarked for redevelopment costs. Nobody loses anything they already had.
TAD money isn’t handed out freely. The Columbus Consolidated Government has strict rules that prevent developers from gaming the system or asking for more than the public interest warrants. Here are the four main guardrails:
| The Rule | What It Means in Plain English |
|---|---|
| The 15% Cap | TAD assistance cannot exceed 15% of the total project cost. A $100 million development can receive at most $15 million in TAD funds. The city can waive this cap only for massive, standalone infrastructure projects with extraordinary public benefit. |
| The “But For” Test | Developers must prove — with actual financial audits — that “but for” the TAD money, the project simply couldn’t happen. If a developer could make money without the TAD, they don’t qualify. The hurdle has to be real: toxic cleanup, buried utility lines, a parking deck the market won’t pay for, etc. |
| Developer Skin in the Game | The developer must commit their own money — cash or equity — equal to at least 15% of the total project cost. The city won’t backstop a developer who has nothing at risk. |
| The 1.20x Safety Margin | When the city issues bonds to fund a project, the developer’s projected annual tax increment must be at least 1.20 times the annual bond payment. If the bond costs $1 million a year to service, the projected new tax revenue must be at least $1.2 million. This 20% cushion protects the public from a situation where the TAD can’t cover its own debt. |
Your annual property tax bill isn’t one payment going to one place. It’s actually divided into slices, each going to a different taxing authority. In Columbus, the main slices are:
For a TAD to reach its maximum funding potential, each taxing authority must sign an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) agreeing to contribute their slice of the new increment to the fund. When the Muscogee County School Board opts in, the total amount available grows substantially — and bonds can be paid off much faster.
💡 What happens if the TAD does better than expected?
If a TAD starts generating more money than the projections called for, Columbus policy requires that all the excess goes toward paying off the bonds early — not toward new spending. The faster the debt is retired, the sooner the full tax base is freed up for the city and schools.
The Uptown TAD has generated roughly $2.5 million in fund balances, while the 6th Avenue/Liberty District TAD sits at around $700,000. Both are real TADs operating in Columbus right now. So why the gap?
The short answer: a TAD only generates as much as the development inside it is worth. If a district attracts big, high-value commercial projects, the tax increment is enormous. If a district attracts smaller, community-focused projects, the increment is more modest. Three specific factors drive the difference:
TAD funds only grow when developers build things that dramatically raise property values. The type of project matters enormously.
| Uptown TAD | Liberty District TAD |
|---|---|
| High-density commercial boom Uptown has seen a wave of major, tightly stacked developments: the multi-phase Riverfront Place project (over $250 million in total investment, including luxury apartments and the new Synovus corporate headquarters), boutique hotels, and mixed-use developments like Highside Market. Each one added millions in new taxable value all at once. |
Community-focused, smaller scale The Liberty District TAD was created to preserve and revitalize a historically significant African American commercial and cultural corridor. Its projects — historic preservation, affordable housing, and smaller retail infill — are doing important community work, but they generate smaller, more gradual property value jumps than luxury towers and corporate campuses. |
TADs don’t create demand out of thin air. They work best in areas where market interest already exists but is being blocked by a specific financial obstacle. Uptown and the Liberty District started from very different baselines.
| Uptown TAD | Liberty District TAD |
|---|---|
| Already had momentum Uptown already had Columbus State University’s RiverPark Campus, a thriving dining scene, and major corporate anchors — including Synovus, which later moved its headquarters directly into the Riverfront Place development. Private developers were already lined up and eager to build. The TAD accelerated what the market was already trying to do. |
Building from a harder start The Liberty District is doing the heavier, slower work of rebuilding a community that experienced decades of disinvestment. Attracting developers there requires more effort and the projects take longer to get underway. Less development means less new taxable value, which means a smaller annual increment — even though the TAD is doing exactly what it was designed to do. |
Large developments don’t show up on the property tax rolls the moment a shovel hits the ground. There’s a lag — sometimes a year or more — before the tax assessor certifies the new value. So a district full of big projects that all opened recently might look modest on paper compared to one that’s been producing increment revenue for a decade.
In Uptown, large-scale projects have been opening continuously since the early 2000s, each adding to the cumulative fund. In the Liberty District, projects have been smaller and more staggered — so the “ramp-up” in certified property values is much slower.
| A Tale of Two TADs These two TADs aren’t competing with each other. They’re doing different things: |
||
| Uptown TAD (~$2.5M) | Liberty District TAD (~$700K) | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary goal | High-density commercial & residential growth | Historic preservation, affordable housing, community reinvestment |
| Type of projects | Luxury apartments, boutique hotels, corporate HQ, retail market | Affordable homes, historic building rehab, small retail infill |
| Property value jumps | Large and fast — millions at a time | Smaller and gradual — incremental gains |
| What success looks like | Rapid bond payoff, major tax base expansion | Community stabilization, preserved history, homes for real people |
A larger TAD fund balance isn’t necessarily a better TAD. It just means different development happened inside it.